Skip to main content

Duffy vs Oxley

Property investment comparison - Duffy, ACT 2611 vs Oxley, ACT 2903

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Duffy wins 3, Oxley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDuffyOxley
Median house price$965K$970K
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%4.57%
1-year house growth+5.1%-3.9%
3-year house growth-4.9%+4.1%
Vacancy rate2.6%0.1%
Population3,3951,703

Duffy vs Oxley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $965K in Duffy and $970K in Oxley, so Duffy is the cheaper entry point, with Oxley houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.00% in Duffy and 3.98% in Oxley, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Duffy and -3.9% in Oxley, so recent momentum favours Duffy, while Oxley went backwards.

Looking back three years, Duffy houses are -4.9% and Oxley houses +4.1%, so Oxley has compounded faster than Duffy over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Oxley and 2.6% in Duffy, so landlords in Oxley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Duffy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,395 against 1,703, larger than Oxley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Duffy for a lower purchase price, Duffy for recent price momentum, Oxley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison