Dunorlan vs Tranmere
Property investment comparison - Dunorlan, TAS 7304 vs Tranmere, TAS 7018
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dunorlan wins 1, Tranmere wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dunorlan | Tranmere |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $890K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.27% | 3.15% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.6% |
| Population | 145 | 2,218 |
Dunorlan vs Tranmere: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Dunorlan and $1.2M in Tranmere, so Tranmere is the cheaper entry point, with Dunorlan houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Tranmere leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.15%, compared with 2.27% in Dunorlan, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Dunorlan and 1.6% in Tranmere, so landlords in Dunorlan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tranmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,218 against 145, roughly 15 times the size of Dunorlan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tranmere for rental income, Tranmere for a lower purchase price, Dunorlan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison