Dunrobin vs Stratford
Property investment comparison - Dunrobin, VIC 3312 vs Stratford, VIC 3862
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dunrobin wins 0, Stratford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dunrobin | Stratford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $585K | $585K |
| Median unit price | - | $355K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.93% | 4.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.25% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.5% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.5% |
| Population | 70 | 2,980 |
Dunrobin vs Stratford: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $585K in Dunrobin and $585K in Stratford.
On cash flow, Stratford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 2.93% in Dunrobin, a gap of 1.97 percentage points.
Stratford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,980 against 70, roughly 43 times the size of Dunrobin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stratford for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison