Dunrobin vs Whittington
Property investment comparison - Dunrobin, VIC 3312 vs Whittington, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dunrobin wins 1, Whittington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dunrobin | Whittington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $585K | $590K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.93% | 4.25% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.02% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.0% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.2% |
| Population | 70 | 3,990 |
Dunrobin vs Whittington: what the numbers say
The median house price is $585K in Dunrobin and $590K in Whittington, so Dunrobin is the cheaper entry point, with Whittington houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Whittington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.25%, compared with 2.93% in Dunrobin, a gap of 1.32 percentage points.
Whittington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,990 against 70, roughly 57 times the size of Dunrobin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Whittington for rental income, Dunrobin for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison