Skip to main content

Durack vs Forest Lake

Property investment comparison - Durack, QLD 4077 vs Forest Lake, QLD 4078

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Durack wins 5, Forest Lake wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDurackForest Lake
Median house price$1M$1.0M
Median unit price$735K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.54%3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%3.69%
1-year house growth+17.3%+14.8%
3-year house growth+54.3%+47.3%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.4%
Population7,78822,676

Durack vs Forest Lake: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1M in Durack and $1.0M in Forest Lake, so Durack is the cheaper entry point, with Forest Lake houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.54% in Durack and 3.56% in Forest Lake, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.3% in Durack and +14.8% in Forest Lake, so recent momentum favours Durack, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Durack houses are +54.3% and Forest Lake houses +47.3%, so Durack has compounded faster than Forest Lake over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Durack and 1.4% in Forest Lake, so landlords in Durack face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Forest Lake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,676 against 7,788, roughly 2.9 times the size of Durack; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Durack for a lower purchase price, Durack for recent price momentum, Durack for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison