Skip to main content

Durack vs Pimpama

Property investment comparison - Durack, QLD 4077 vs Pimpama, QLD 4209

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Durack wins 4, Pimpama wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDurackPimpama
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$735K$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.54%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%-
1-year house growth+17.3%+15.6%
3-year house growth+54.3%+46.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population7,78824,601

Durack vs Pimpama: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Durack and $1M in Pimpama.

For units, Durack sits at a median of $735K against $835K in Pimpama, which makes Durack the more affordable unit market and Pimpama the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.3% in Durack and +15.6% in Pimpama, so recent momentum favours Durack, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Durack houses are +54.3% and Pimpama houses +46.0%, so Durack has compounded faster than Pimpama over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Durack and 1.1% in Pimpama, so landlords in Durack face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pimpama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,601 against 7,788, roughly 3.2 times the size of Durack; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Durack for recent price momentum, Durack for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison