Dysart vs Gundiah
Property investment comparison - Dysart, QLD 4745 vs Gundiah, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dysart wins 0, Gundiah wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Dysart | Gundiah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $245K | $230K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 9.30% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.1% |
| Population | 2,918 | 89 |
Dysart vs Gundiah: what the numbers say
The median house price is $245K in Dysart and $230K in Gundiah, so Gundiah is the cheaper entry point, with Dysart houses about 7% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Gundiah and 2.0% in Dysart, so landlords in Gundiah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Dysart is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,918 against 89, roughly 33 times the size of Gundiah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gundiah for a lower purchase price, Gundiah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison