Earlwood vs Parma
Property investment comparison - Earlwood, NSW 2206 vs Parma, NSW 2540
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Earlwood wins 2, Parma wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Earlwood | Parma |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.1M | $2.1M |
| Median unit price | $965K | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.43% | 1.48% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.83% | 4.64% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Population | 18,053 | 167 |
Earlwood vs Parma: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.1M in Earlwood and $2.1M in Parma, so Parma is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Earlwood sits at a median of $965K against $625K in Parma, which makes Parma the more affordable unit market and Earlwood the pricier one.
On cash flow, Earlwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.43%, compared with 1.48% in Parma, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Earlwood and 2.3% in Parma, so landlords in Earlwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Earlwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,053 against 167, roughly 108 times the size of Parma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Earlwood for rental income, Parma for a lower purchase price, Earlwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison