Skip to main content

East Branxton vs Tenambit

Property investment comparison - East Branxton, NSW 2335 vs Tenambit, NSW 2323

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: East Branxton wins 2, Tenambit wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEast BranxtonTenambit
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price-$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.88%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%4.20%
1-year house growth+12.8%estimate+11.8%
3-year house growth-+26.2%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.3%
Population1,8813,088

East Branxton vs Tenambit: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in East Branxton and $800K in Tenambit.

On cash flow, Tenambit leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.88% in East Branxton, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in East Branxton (an estimate) and +11.8% in Tenambit, so recent momentum favours East Branxton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Tenambit and 1.5% in East Branxton, so landlords in Tenambit face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tenambit is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,088 against 1,881, larger than East Branxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tenambit for rental income, East Branxton for recent price momentum, Tenambit for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison