Skip to main content

East Victoria Park vs Kingsley

Property investment comparison - East Victoria Park, WA 6101 vs Kingsley, WA 6026

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: East Victoria Park wins 1, Kingsley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEast Victoria ParkKingsley
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$720K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.37%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+20.2%-
3-year house growth+57.9%-
Vacancy rate0.9%0.5%
Population10,56913,204

East Victoria Park vs Kingsley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in East Victoria Park and $1.3M in Kingsley, so East Victoria Park is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsley houses about 2% dearer.

For units, East Victoria Park sits at a median of $720K against $510K in Kingsley, which makes Kingsley the more affordable unit market and East Victoria Park the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Kingsley and 0.9% in East Victoria Park, so landlords in Kingsley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kingsley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,204 against 10,569, larger than East Victoria Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: East Victoria Park for a lower purchase price, Kingsley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison