Skip to main content

Eastern View vs Kew

Property investment comparison - Eastern View, VIC 3231 vs Kew, VIC 3101

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eastern View wins 1, Kew wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEastern ViewKew
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$1.0M$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.95%2.35%
Gross rental yield (units)3.14%4.05%
1-year house growth--3.4%
3-year house growth--9.3%
Vacancy rate16.0%1.6%
Population4724,499

Eastern View vs Kew: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Eastern View and $2.5M in Kew, so Eastern View is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Eastern View sits at a median of $1.0M against $850K in Kew, which makes Kew the more affordable unit market and Eastern View the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kew leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.35%, compared with 1.95% in Eastern View, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Kew and 16.0% in Eastern View, so landlords in Kew face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kew is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,499 against 47, roughly 521 times the size of Eastern View; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kew for rental income, Eastern View for a lower purchase price, Kew for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison