Skip to main content

Eastwood vs Harkness

Property investment comparison - Eastwood, VIC 3875 vs Harkness, VIC 3337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eastwood wins 2, Harkness wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEastwoodHarkness
Median house price$635K$635K
Median unit price$440K$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%4.80%
1-year house growth+4.3%+10.9%estimate
3-year house growth+3.5%-
Vacancy rate2.2%3.2%
Population2,85512,463

Eastwood vs Harkness: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $635K in Eastwood and $635K in Harkness.

On cash flow, Eastwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.71% in Harkness, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Eastwood and +10.9% in Harkness (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Harkness, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Eastwood and 3.2% in Harkness, so landlords in Eastwood face less competition for tenants.

Harkness is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,463 against 2,855, roughly 4.4 times the size of Eastwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Eastwood for rental income, Harkness for recent price momentum, Eastwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison