Eaton vs Mount Melville
Property investment comparison - Eaton, WA 6232 vs Mount Melville, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eaton wins 3, Mount Melville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eaton | Mount Melville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $740K |
| Median unit price | - | $795K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.60% | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.96% | 3.29% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +72.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 0.6% |
| Population | 8,669 | 1,007 |
Eaton vs Mount Melville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $735K in Eaton and $740K in Mount Melville, so Eaton is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Melville houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Eaton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 4.10% in Mount Melville, a gap of 0.50 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mount Melville and 1.0% in Eaton, so landlords in Mount Melville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Eaton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,669 against 1,007, roughly 9 times the size of Mount Melville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eaton for rental income, Eaton for a lower purchase price, Mount Melville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison