Edinburgh vs Euston
Property investment comparison - Edinburgh, NSW 2333 vs Euston, NSW 2737
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edinburgh wins 2, Euston wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Edinburgh | Euston |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $520K | $520K |
| Median unit price | $310K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.50% | 3.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.85% | 4.69% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -3.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 13,795 | 822 |
Edinburgh vs Euston: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $520K in Edinburgh and $520K in Euston.
On cash flow, Edinburgh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 3.00% in Euston, a gap of 3.50 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Euston and 2.0% in Edinburgh, so landlords in Euston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Edinburgh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,795 against 822, roughly 17 times the size of Euston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Edinburgh for rental income, Euston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison