Edinburgh vs Tocumwal
Property investment comparison - Edinburgh, NSW 2333 vs Tocumwal, NSW 2714
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edinburgh wins 2, Tocumwal wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Edinburgh | Tocumwal |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $520K | $520K |
| Median unit price | $310K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.50% | 4.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.85% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Population | 13,795 | 2,862 |
Edinburgh vs Tocumwal: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $520K in Edinburgh and $520K in Tocumwal.
On cash flow, Edinburgh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 4.90% in Tocumwal, a gap of 1.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Edinburgh and 2.6% in Tocumwal, so landlords in Edinburgh face less competition for tenants.
Edinburgh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,795 against 2,862, roughly 4.8 times the size of Tocumwal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Edinburgh for rental income, Edinburgh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison