Skip to main content

Edinburgh vs Tumut

Property investment comparison - Edinburgh, NSW 2333 vs Tumut, NSW 2720

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edinburgh wins 3, Tumut wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdinburghTumut
Median house price$520K$525K
Median unit price$310K$380K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.50%4.76%
Gross rental yield (units)7.85%-
1-year house growth-+4.5%
3-year house growth-+24.0%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population13,7956,613

Edinburgh vs Tumut: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Edinburgh and $525K in Tumut, so Edinburgh is the cheaper entry point, with Tumut houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Edinburgh sits at a median of $310K against $380K in Tumut, which makes Edinburgh the more affordable unit market and Tumut the pricier one.

On cash flow, Edinburgh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 4.76% in Tumut, a gap of 1.74 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Tumut and 2.0% in Edinburgh, so landlords in Tumut face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edinburgh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,795 against 6,613, roughly 2.1 times the size of Tumut; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edinburgh for rental income, Edinburgh for a lower purchase price, Tumut for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison