Skip to main content

Edinburgh vs Young

Property investment comparison - Edinburgh, NSW 2333 vs Young, NSW 2594

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Edinburgh wins 4, Young wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEdinburghYoung
Median house price$520K$525K
Median unit price$310K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.50%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)7.85%4.76%
1-year house growth-+7.2%
3-year house growth-+19.7%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.9%
Population13,79510,610

Edinburgh vs Young: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Edinburgh and $525K in Young, so Edinburgh is the cheaper entry point, with Young houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Edinburgh sits at a median of $310K against $425K in Young, which makes Edinburgh the more affordable unit market and Young the pricier one.

On cash flow, Edinburgh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.50%, compared with 4.60% in Young, a gap of 1.90 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Young and 2.0% in Edinburgh, so landlords in Young face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Edinburgh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,795 against 10,610, larger than Young; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Edinburgh for rental income, Edinburgh for a lower purchase price, Young for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison