Elderslie vs Gilead
Property investment comparison - Elderslie, NSW 2570 vs Gilead, NSW 2560
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Elderslie wins 1, Gilead wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Elderslie | Gilead |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.30% | 3.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.00% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +19.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.1% |
| Population | 7,878 | 882 |
Elderslie vs Gilead: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Elderslie and $1.2M in Gilead, so Gilead is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Gilead leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 3.30% in Elderslie, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Elderslie and 1.1% in Gilead, so landlords in Elderslie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Elderslie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,878 against 882, roughly 9 times the size of Gilead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gilead for rental income, Gilead for a lower purchase price, Elderslie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison