Skip to main content

Elizabeth Downs vs Zadows Landing

Property investment comparison - Elizabeth Downs, SA 5113 vs Zadows Landing, SA 5254

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Elizabeth Downs wins 3, Zadows Landing wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricElizabeth DownsZadows Landing
Median house price$625K$645K
Median unit price-$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%2.94%
Gross rental yield (units)4.74%-
1-year house growth+15.3%-
3-year house growth+60.8%-
Vacancy rate1.2%9.2%
Population5,16025

Elizabeth Downs vs Zadows Landing: what the numbers say

The median house price is $625K in Elizabeth Downs and $645K in Zadows Landing, so Elizabeth Downs is the cheaper entry point, with Zadows Landing houses about 3% dearer.

On cash flow, Elizabeth Downs leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 2.94% in Zadows Landing, a gap of 1.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Elizabeth Downs and 9.2% in Zadows Landing, so landlords in Elizabeth Downs face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Elizabeth Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,160 against 25, roughly 206 times the size of Zadows Landing; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Elizabeth Downs for rental income, Elizabeth Downs for a lower purchase price, Elizabeth Downs for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison