Skip to main content

Ellalong vs North Macksville

Property investment comparison - Ellalong, NSW 2325 vs North Macksville, NSW 2447

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ellalong wins 4, North Macksville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEllalongNorth Macksville
Median house price$825K$820K
Median unit price$470K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.85%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)5.79%5.18%
1-year house growth+10.2%+7.8%estimate
3-year house growth+15.6%-
Vacancy rate2.1%2.6%
Population1,351669

Ellalong vs North Macksville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Ellalong and $820K in North Macksville, so North Macksville is the cheaper entry point, with Ellalong houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Ellalong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.85%, compared with 3.79% in North Macksville, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Ellalong and +7.8% in North Macksville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ellalong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Ellalong and 2.6% in North Macksville, so landlords in Ellalong face less competition for tenants.

Ellalong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,351 against 669, roughly 2.0 times the size of North Macksville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ellalong for rental income, North Macksville for a lower purchase price, Ellalong for recent price momentum, Ellalong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison