Ellerslie vs Murchison
Property investment comparison - Ellerslie, VIC 3265 vs Murchison, VIC 3610
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ellerslie wins 2, Murchison wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ellerslie | Murchison |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $405K | $425K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.40% | 5.29% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 7.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Population | 157 | 884 |
Ellerslie vs Murchison: what the numbers say
The median house price is $405K in Ellerslie and $425K in Murchison, so Ellerslie is the cheaper entry point, with Murchison houses about 5% dearer.
On cash flow, Ellerslie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.40%, compared with 5.29% in Murchison, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.7% in Murchison and 3.9% in Ellerslie, so landlords in Murchison face less competition for tenants.
Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 157, roughly 6 times the size of Ellerslie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ellerslie for rental income, Ellerslie for a lower purchase price, Murchison for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison