Skip to main content

Ellinbank vs Footscray

Property investment comparison - Ellinbank, VIC 3821 vs Footscray, VIC 3011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ellinbank wins 1, Footscray wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEllinbankFootscray
Median house price$930K$935K
Median unit price$830K$470K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.38%3.49%
Gross rental yield (units)1.53%5.80%
1-year house growth--0.9%
3-year house growth-+1.1%
Vacancy rate12.3%1.5%
Population22917,131

Ellinbank vs Footscray: what the numbers say

The median house price is $930K in Ellinbank and $935K in Footscray, so Ellinbank is the cheaper entry point, with Footscray houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ellinbank sits at a median of $830K against $470K in Footscray, which makes Footscray the more affordable unit market and Ellinbank the pricier one.

On cash flow, Footscray leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.49%, compared with 2.38% in Ellinbank, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Footscray and 12.3% in Ellinbank, so landlords in Footscray face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Footscray is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,131 against 229, roughly 75 times the size of Ellinbank; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Footscray for rental income, Ellinbank for a lower purchase price, Footscray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison