Embleton vs Tuart Hill
Property investment comparison - Embleton, WA 6062 vs Tuart Hill, WA 6060
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Embleton wins 1, Tuart Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Embleton | Tuart Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $725K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.78% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.99% | 4.87% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.1%estimate | +23.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +78.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Population | 3,600 | 7,541 |
Embleton vs Tuart Hill: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Embleton and $1.1M in Tuart Hill.
Over the past year house prices moved +22.1% in Embleton (an estimate) and +23.3% in Tuart Hill, so recent momentum favours Tuart Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Tuart Hill and 0.7% in Embleton, so landlords in Tuart Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tuart Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,541 against 3,600, roughly 2.1 times the size of Embleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tuart Hill for recent price momentum, Tuart Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison