Emerald vs Lyndhurst
Property investment comparison - Emerald, VIC 3782 vs Lyndhurst, VIC 3975
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Emerald wins 2, Lyndhurst wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Emerald | Lyndhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980K | $985K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.39% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.97% | 4.77% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.0% | +6.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +7.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 3.1% |
| Population | 5,890 | 8,926 |
Emerald vs Lyndhurst: what the numbers say
The median house price is $980K in Emerald and $985K in Lyndhurst, so Emerald is the cheaper entry point, with Lyndhurst houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +2.0% in Emerald and +6.0% in Lyndhurst (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lyndhurst, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Emerald and 3.1% in Lyndhurst, so landlords in Emerald face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lyndhurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,926 against 5,890, larger than Emerald; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Emerald for a lower purchase price, Lyndhurst for recent price momentum, Emerald for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison