Enfield vs Lewisham
Property investment comparison - Enfield, NSW 2136 vs Lewisham, NSW 2049
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Enfield wins 2, Lewisham wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Enfield | Lewisham |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.4M | $2.4M |
| Median unit price | $810K | $820K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.43% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.59% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.3% | +8.0% |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | +17.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Population | 2,992 | 4,060 |
Enfield vs Lewisham: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.4M in Enfield and $2.4M in Lewisham.
For units, Enfield sits at a median of $810K against $820K in Lewisham, which makes Enfield the more affordable unit market and Lewisham the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved -4.3% in Enfield and +8.0% in Lewisham, so recent momentum favours Lewisham, while Enfield went backwards.
Looking back three years, Enfield houses are +22.3% and Lewisham houses +17.4%, so Enfield has compounded faster than Lewisham over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.0%.
Lewisham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,060 against 2,992, larger than Enfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lewisham for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison