Skip to main content

Enfield vs Wheeler Heights

Property investment comparison - Enfield, NSW 2136 vs Wheeler Heights, NSW 2097

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Enfield wins 2, Wheeler Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEnfieldWheeler Heights
Median house price$2.4M$2.4M
Median unit price$810K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.43%-
Gross rental yield (units)-2.83%
1-year house growth-4.3%+5.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%+1.4%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population2,9923,232

Enfield vs Wheeler Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Enfield and $2.4M in Wheeler Heights, so Enfield is the cheaper entry point, with Wheeler Heights houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.3% in Enfield and +5.1% in Wheeler Heights, so recent momentum favours Wheeler Heights, while Enfield went backwards.

Looking back three years, Enfield houses are +22.3% and Wheeler Heights houses +1.4%, so Enfield has compounded faster than Wheeler Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wheeler Heights and 2.0% in Enfield, so landlords in Wheeler Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wheeler Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,232 against 2,992, larger than Enfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Enfield for a lower purchase price, Wheeler Heights for recent price momentum, Wheeler Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison