Skip to main content

Essendon vs Gherang

Property investment comparison - Essendon, VIC 3040 vs Gherang, VIC 3240

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon wins 2, Gherang wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEssendonGherang
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$600K$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.28%2.34%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%5.13%
1-year house growth+6.8%-
3-year house growth+1.4%-
Vacancy rate1.5%8.4%
Population21,240391

Essendon vs Gherang: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Essendon and $1.8M in Gherang, so Gherang is the cheaper entry point, with Essendon houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Essendon sits at a median of $600K against $605K in Gherang, which makes Essendon the more affordable unit market and Gherang the pricier one.

On cash flow, Gherang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.34%, compared with 2.28% in Essendon, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Essendon and 8.4% in Gherang, so landlords in Essendon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 391, roughly 54 times the size of Gherang; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gherang for rental income, Gherang for a lower purchase price, Essendon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison