Skip to main content

Essendon vs Ivanhoe

Property investment comparison - Essendon, VIC 3040 vs Ivanhoe, VIC 3079

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon wins 3, Ivanhoe wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEssendonIvanhoe
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$600K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.28%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.15%
1-year house growth+6.8%-2.9%
3-year house growth+1.4%+12.1%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.2%
Population21,24013,374

Essendon vs Ivanhoe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Essendon and $1.8M in Ivanhoe, so Ivanhoe is the cheaper entry point, with Essendon houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Essendon sits at a median of $600K against $750K in Ivanhoe, which makes Essendon the more affordable unit market and Ivanhoe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Essendon and -2.9% in Ivanhoe, so recent momentum favours Essendon, while Ivanhoe went backwards.

Looking back three years, Essendon houses are +1.4% and Ivanhoe houses +12.1%, so Ivanhoe has compounded faster than Essendon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Ivanhoe and 1.5% in Essendon, so landlords in Ivanhoe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 13,374, larger than Ivanhoe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ivanhoe for a lower purchase price, Essendon for recent price momentum, Ivanhoe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison