Skip to main content

Essendon vs Ombersley

Property investment comparison - Essendon, VIC 3040 vs Ombersley, VIC 3241

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon wins 2, Ombersley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEssendonOmbersley
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$600K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.28%1.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%5.53%
1-year house growth+6.8%-
3-year house growth+1.4%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.5%
Population21,24093

Essendon vs Ombersley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Essendon and $1.8M in Ombersley, so Essendon is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Essendon sits at a median of $600K against $365K in Ombersley, which makes Ombersley the more affordable unit market and Essendon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Essendon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.28%, compared with 1.60% in Ombersley, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ombersley and 1.5% in Essendon, so landlords in Ombersley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 93, roughly 228 times the size of Ombersley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Essendon for rental income, Essendon for a lower purchase price, Ombersley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison