Skip to main content

Essendon vs Ormond

Property investment comparison - Essendon, VIC 3040 vs Ormond, VIC 3204

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon wins 5, Ormond wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEssendonOrmond
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$600K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.28%2.59%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.06%
1-year house growth+6.8%-5.0%estimate
3-year house growth+1.4%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.9%
Population21,2408,328

Essendon vs Ormond: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Essendon and $1.8M in Ormond, so Essendon is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Essendon sits at a median of $600K against $720K in Ormond, which makes Essendon the more affordable unit market and Ormond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ormond leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 2.28% in Essendon, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Essendon and -5.0% in Ormond (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Essendon, while Ormond went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Essendon and 1.9% in Ormond, so landlords in Essendon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 8,328, roughly 2.6 times the size of Ormond; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ormond for rental income, Essendon for a lower purchase price, Essendon for recent price momentum, Essendon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison