Essendon vs Ravenhall
Property investment comparison - Essendon, VIC 3040 vs Ravenhall, VIC 3023
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon wins 2, Ravenhall wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Essendon | Ravenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Median unit price | $600K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.28% | 1.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.59% | 3.22% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 21,240 | 2,295 |
Essendon vs Ravenhall: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Essendon and $1.8M in Ravenhall, so Ravenhall is the cheaper entry point, with Essendon houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Essendon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.28%, compared with 1.66% in Ravenhall, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Ravenhall and 1.5% in Essendon, so landlords in Ravenhall face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Essendon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,240 against 2,295, roughly 9 times the size of Ravenhall; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Essendon for rental income, Ravenhall for a lower purchase price, Ravenhall for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison