Skip to main content

Essendon West vs Wheelers Hill

Property investment comparison - Essendon West, VIC 3040 vs Wheelers Hill, VIC 3150

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Essendon West wins 4, Wheelers Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEssendon WestWheelers Hill
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$785K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.09%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.63%3.88%
1-year house growth+3.8%estimate-1.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.1%1.6%
Population1,55920,652

Essendon West vs Wheelers Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Essendon West and $1.5M in Wheelers Hill, so Essendon West is the cheaper entry point, with Wheelers Hill houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Essendon West sits at a median of $785K against $1.0M in Wheelers Hill, which makes Essendon West the more affordable unit market and Wheelers Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Essendon West (an estimate) and -1.1% in Wheelers Hill (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Essendon West, while Wheelers Hill went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Wheelers Hill and 3.1% in Essendon West, so landlords in Wheelers Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wheelers Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,652 against 1,559, roughly 13 times the size of Essendon West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Essendon West for a lower purchase price, Essendon West for recent price momentum, Wheelers Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison