Eumemmerring vs Ullina
Property investment comparison - Eumemmerring, VIC 3177 vs Ullina, VIC 3370
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eumemmerring wins 0, Ullina wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eumemmerring | Ullina |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $735K |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.86% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.75% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Population | 2,285 | 25 |
Eumemmerring vs Ullina: what the numbers say
The median house price is $740K in Eumemmerring and $735K in Ullina, so Ullina is the cheaper entry point, with Eumemmerring houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.7%.
Eumemmerring is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,285 against 25, roughly 91 times the size of Ullina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ullina for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison