Skip to main content

Eureka vs Irrewillipe

Property investment comparison - Eureka, VIC 3350 vs Irrewillipe, VIC 3249

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eureka wins 1, Irrewillipe wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEurekaIrrewillipe
Median house price$500K$495K
Median unit price$455K$470K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.51%5.17%
1-year house growth+15.3%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population633100

Eureka vs Irrewillipe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $500K in Eureka and $495K in Irrewillipe, so Irrewillipe is the cheaper entry point, with Eureka houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Eureka sits at a median of $455K against $470K in Irrewillipe, which makes Eureka the more affordable unit market and Irrewillipe the pricier one.

On cash flow, Irrewillipe leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.72%, compared with 4.00% in Eureka, a gap of 0.72 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Irrewillipe and 1.2% in Eureka, so landlords in Irrewillipe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Eureka is the bigger suburb, with a population of 633 against 100, roughly 6 times the size of Irrewillipe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Irrewillipe for rental income, Irrewillipe for a lower purchase price, Irrewillipe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison