Everton Park vs Maudsland
Property investment comparison - Everton Park, QLD 4053 vs Maudsland, QLD 4210
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Everton Park wins 3, Maudsland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Everton Park | Maudsland |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $870K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.04% | 3.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.12% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.8%estimate | +12.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +52.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Population | 10,111 | 8,073 |
Everton Park vs Maudsland: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Everton Park and $1.4M in Maudsland, so Everton Park is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Maudsland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 3.04% in Everton Park, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.8% in Everton Park (an estimate) and +12.9% in Maudsland, so recent momentum favours Everton Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.
Everton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,111 against 8,073, larger than Maudsland; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maudsland for rental income, Everton Park for a lower purchase price, Everton Park for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison