Skip to main content

Ewingsdale vs Meadowbank

Property investment comparison - Ewingsdale, NSW 2481 vs Meadowbank, NSW 2114

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ewingsdale wins 2, Meadowbank wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricEwingsdaleMeadowbank
Median house price$2.7M$2.7M
Median unit price$1.2M$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.66%1.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.81%5.07%
1-year house growth+2.7%-
3-year house growth+5.7%-
Vacancy rate1.5%2.1%
Population1,0255,089

Ewingsdale vs Meadowbank: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.7M in Ewingsdale and $2.7M in Meadowbank, so Meadowbank is the cheaper entry point, with Ewingsdale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ewingsdale sits at a median of $1.2M against $725K in Meadowbank, which makes Meadowbank the more affordable unit market and Ewingsdale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ewingsdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.66%, compared with 1.50% in Meadowbank, a gap of 1.16 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Ewingsdale and 2.1% in Meadowbank, so landlords in Ewingsdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadowbank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,089 against 1,025, roughly 5.0 times the size of Ewingsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ewingsdale for rental income, Meadowbank for a lower purchase price, Ewingsdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison