Eyre vs Point Turton
Property investment comparison - Eyre, SA 5121 vs Point Turton, SA 5575
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Eyre wins 2, Point Turton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Eyre | Point Turton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.15% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.95% | 4.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.5%estimate | +12.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +57.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.5% | 1.5% |
| Population | 1,113 | 350 |
Eyre vs Point Turton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Eyre and $700K in Point Turton.
Over the past year house prices moved +22.5% in Eyre (an estimate) and +12.9% in Point Turton, so recent momentum favours Eyre, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Point Turton and 4.5% in Eyre, so landlords in Point Turton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Eyre is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,113 against 350, roughly 3.2 times the size of Point Turton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eyre for recent price momentum, Point Turton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison