Fairbridge vs Lesmurdie
Property investment comparison - Fairbridge, WA 6208 vs Lesmurdie, WA 6076
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairbridge wins 0, Lesmurdie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fairbridge | Lesmurdie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $670K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.73% | 3.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.38% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +17.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +59.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 1.1% |
| Population | 55 | 8,413 |
Fairbridge vs Lesmurdie: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Fairbridge and $1.2M in Lesmurdie, so Lesmurdie is the cheaper entry point, with Fairbridge houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Lesmurdie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.40%, compared with 2.73% in Fairbridge, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Lesmurdie and 2.2% in Fairbridge, so landlords in Lesmurdie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Lesmurdie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,413 against 55, roughly 153 times the size of Fairbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lesmurdie for rental income, Lesmurdie for a lower purchase price, Lesmurdie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison