Fairbridge vs Padbury
Property investment comparison - Fairbridge, WA 6208 vs Padbury, WA 6025
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairbridge wins 0, Padbury wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fairbridge | Padbury |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.73% | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +22.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +77.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 1.0% |
| Population | 55 | 8,626 |
Fairbridge vs Padbury: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Fairbridge and $1.2M in Padbury.
On cash flow, Padbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.73% in Fairbridge, a gap of 0.55 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Padbury and 2.2% in Fairbridge, so landlords in Padbury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Padbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,626 against 55, roughly 157 times the size of Fairbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Padbury for rental income, Padbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison