Skip to main content

Fairfield vs Northcote

Property investment comparison - Fairfield, VIC 3078 vs Northcote, VIC 3070

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield wins 2, Northcote wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfieldNorthcote
Median house price$1.8M$1.7M
Median unit price-$680K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.59%2.71%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%4.58%
1-year house growth+6.1%+3.1%estimate
3-year house growth+13.2%-
Vacancy rate1.0%1.3%
Population6,53525,276

Fairfield vs Northcote: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Fairfield and $1.7M in Northcote, so Northcote is the cheaper entry point, with Fairfield houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Northcote leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.71%, compared with 2.59% in Fairfield, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.1% in Fairfield and +3.1% in Northcote (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fairfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fairfield and 1.3% in Northcote, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Northcote is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,276 against 6,535, roughly 3.9 times the size of Fairfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Northcote for rental income, Northcote for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for recent price momentum, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison