Skip to main content

Fairfield vs Parkville

Property investment comparison - Fairfield, VIC 3078 vs Parkville, VIC 3052

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield wins 2, Parkville wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfieldParkville
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price-$470K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.59%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%6.33%
1-year house growth+6.1%-2.8%
3-year house growth+13.2%-28.9%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.9%
Population6,5357,074

Fairfield vs Parkville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Fairfield and $1.8M in Parkville, so Parkville is the cheaper entry point, with Fairfield houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Parkville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.59% in Fairfield, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.1% in Fairfield and -2.8% in Parkville, so recent momentum favours Fairfield, while Parkville went backwards.

Looking back three years, Fairfield houses are +13.2% and Parkville houses -28.9%, so Fairfield has compounded faster than Parkville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Parkville and 1.0% in Fairfield, so landlords in Parkville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,074 against 6,535, larger than Fairfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Parkville for rental income, Parkville for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for recent price momentum, Parkville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison