Fairfield vs Pound Creek
Property investment comparison - Fairfield, VIC 3078 vs Pound Creek, VIC 3996
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield wins 2, Pound Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fairfield | Pound Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | $1.7M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.59% | 1.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.42% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +6.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +13.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 3.6% |
| Population | 6,535 | 126 |
Fairfield vs Pound Creek: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.8M in Fairfield and $1.7M in Pound Creek, so Pound Creek is the cheaper entry point, with Fairfield houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Fairfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.59%, compared with 1.70% in Pound Creek, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fairfield and 3.6% in Pound Creek, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Fairfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,535 against 126, roughly 52 times the size of Pound Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fairfield for rental income, Pound Creek for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison