Skip to main content

Fairfield West vs Liverpool

Property investment comparison - Fairfield West, NSW 2165 vs Liverpool, NSW 2170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairfield West wins 2, Liverpool wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairfield WestLiverpool
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.78%2.65%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%5.58%
1-year house growth+8.2%estimate+10.3%
3-year house growth-+23.9%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.3%
Population12,98131,078

Fairfield West vs Liverpool: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Fairfield West and $1.3M in Liverpool, so Fairfield West is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Fairfield West leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.78%, compared with 2.65% in Liverpool, a gap of 0.13 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Fairfield West (an estimate) and +10.3% in Liverpool, so recent momentum favours Liverpool, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Liverpool and 1.7% in Fairfield West, so landlords in Liverpool face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Liverpool is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,078 against 12,981, roughly 2.4 times the size of Fairfield West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairfield West for rental income, Fairfield West for a lower purchase price, Liverpool for recent price momentum, Liverpool for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison