Skip to main content

Fairymead vs Imbil

Property investment comparison - Fairymead, QLD 4670 vs Imbil, QLD 4570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fairymead wins 3, Imbil wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFairymeadImbil
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$590K$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.05%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.77%8.35%
1-year house growth+12.4%+8.1%estimate
3-year house growth+34.6%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.2%
Population281,071

Fairymead vs Imbil: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Fairymead and $850K in Imbil.

For units, Fairymead sits at a median of $590K against $335K in Imbil, which makes Imbil the more affordable unit market and Fairymead the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.05% in Fairymead and 4.00% in Imbil, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.4% in Fairymead and +8.1% in Imbil (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fairymead, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Fairymead and 1.2% in Imbil, so landlords in Fairymead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Imbil is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,071 against 28, roughly 38 times the size of Fairymead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fairymead for recent price momentum, Fairymead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison