Falcon vs Warnbro
Property investment comparison - Falcon, WA 6210 vs Warnbro, WA 6169
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Falcon wins 0, Warnbro wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Falcon | Warnbro |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | $485K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.06% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.6%estimate | +19.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Population | 5,531 | 10,828 |
Falcon vs Warnbro: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Falcon and $800K in Warnbro.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.6% in Falcon (an estimate) and +19.7% in Warnbro (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Warnbro, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Warnbro and 1.6% in Falcon, so landlords in Warnbro face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Warnbro is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,828 against 5,531, larger than Falcon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warnbro for recent price momentum, Warnbro for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison