Skip to main content

Fassifern Valley vs Woombye

Property investment comparison - Fassifern Valley, QLD 4309 vs Woombye, QLD 4559

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fassifern Valley wins 1, Woombye wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFassifern ValleyWoombye
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.31%3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.81%
1-year house growth-+13.8%
3-year house growth-+37.5%
Vacancy rate2.2%0.5%
Population1123,944

Fassifern Valley vs Woombye: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Fassifern Valley and $1.1M in Woombye, so Fassifern Valley is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Woombye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 3.31% in Fassifern Valley, a gap of 0.42 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Woombye and 2.2% in Fassifern Valley, so landlords in Woombye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woombye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,944 against 112, roughly 35 times the size of Fassifern Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woombye for rental income, Fassifern Valley for a lower purchase price, Woombye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison