Skip to main content

Faulconbridge vs Morisset Park

Property investment comparison - Faulconbridge, NSW 2776 vs Morisset Park, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Faulconbridge wins 2, Morisset Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFaulconbridgeMorisset Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$815K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.03%-
Gross rental yield (units)1.92%4.97%
1-year house growth+11.6%estimate+3.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%2.2%
Population4,1561,085

Faulconbridge vs Morisset Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Faulconbridge and $1.2M in Morisset Park.

For units, Faulconbridge sits at a median of $815K against $585K in Morisset Park, which makes Morisset Park the more affordable unit market and Faulconbridge the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Faulconbridge (an estimate) and +3.4% in Morisset Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Faulconbridge, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Faulconbridge and 2.2% in Morisset Park, so landlords in Faulconbridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Faulconbridge is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,156 against 1,085, roughly 3.8 times the size of Morisset Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Faulconbridge for recent price momentum, Faulconbridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison