Skip to main content

Fawkner vs Maintongoon

Property investment comparison - Fawkner, VIC 3060 vs Maintongoon, VIC 3714

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fawkner wins 2, Maintongoon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFawknerMaintongoon
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$650K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%2.37%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.15%
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%1.2%
Population14,27475

Fawkner vs Maintongoon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Fawkner and $850K in Maintongoon.

For units, Fawkner sits at a median of $650K against $550K in Maintongoon, which makes Maintongoon the more affordable unit market and Fawkner the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fawkner leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.37% in Maintongoon, a gap of 1.23 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fawkner and 1.2% in Maintongoon, so landlords in Fawkner face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fawkner is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,274 against 75, roughly 190 times the size of Maintongoon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fawkner for rental income, Fawkner for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison