Skip to main content

Fawkner vs Romsey

Property investment comparison - Fawkner, VIC 3060 vs Romsey, VIC 3434

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fawkner wins 2, Romsey wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFawknerRomsey
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$650K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+6.8%estimate+4.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%1.1%
Population14,2745,797

Fawkner vs Romsey: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Fawkner and $850K in Romsey.

For units, Fawkner sits at a median of $650K against $540K in Romsey, which makes Romsey the more affordable unit market and Fawkner the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Fawkner (an estimate) and +4.3% in Romsey (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fawkner, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fawkner and 1.1% in Romsey, so landlords in Fawkner face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fawkner is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,274 against 5,797, roughly 2.5 times the size of Romsey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fawkner for recent price momentum, Fawkner for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Fawkner vs Romsey: Property Investment Comparison (2026)