Skip to main content

Fennell Bay vs Queanbeyan

Property investment comparison - Fennell Bay, NSW 2283 vs Queanbeyan, NSW 2620

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fennell Bay wins 3, Queanbeyan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFennell BayQueanbeyan
Median house price$870K$875K
Median unit price-$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.89%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)5.14%-
1-year house growth+11.4%estimate+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.7%
Population1,7806,409

Fennell Bay vs Queanbeyan: what the numbers say

The median house price is $870K in Fennell Bay and $875K in Queanbeyan, so Fennell Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Queanbeyan houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Queanbeyan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.89% in Fennell Bay, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Fennell Bay (an estimate) and +1.2% in Queanbeyan (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Fennell Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Fennell Bay and 1.7% in Queanbeyan, so landlords in Fennell Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Queanbeyan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,409 against 1,780, roughly 3.6 times the size of Fennell Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Queanbeyan for rental income, Fennell Bay for a lower purchase price, Fennell Bay for recent price momentum, Fennell Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison